Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Movie Review (2011)
Browse articles:
Auto Beauty Business Culture Dieting DIY Events Fashion Finance Food Freelancing Gardening Health Hobbies Home Internet Jobs Law Local Media Men's Health Mobile Nutrition Parenting Pets Pregnancy Products Psychology Real Estate Relationships Science Seniors Sports Technology Travel Wellness Women's Health
Browse companies:
Automotive Crafts, Hobbies & Gifts Department Stores Electronics & Wearables Fashion Food & Drink Health & Beauty Home & Garden Online Services & Software Sports & Outdoors Subscription Boxes Toys, Kids & Baby Travel & Events

Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Movie Review (2011)

Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Movie Review (2011)

The one thing that always made the “Planet of the Apes” a bit campy was actors in makeup and monkey suits. So in one instance, here’s where technology, specifically the use motion- capture technology as seen in “Avatar,” can nearly single-handedly justify revisiting an old franchise. But the apes of “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” don’t just look amazing — they have souls. So does this script, which delivers one of the summer’s major surprises in terms of pure entertainment and depth of storytelling.

Unlike the “Transformers” franchise, where giant steel-crushing robots have gotten lost in absurd plots driven by pointless human characters, “Rise” keeps the primates as an almost exclusive focus. Somewhere close to the middle, humans even take a back seat to the captivating ape-centered story arcs crafted by writers Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver. Not only do apes most definitely rise in this film, but they also do so with clear marvellous purpose. The story of how a potential cure for Alzheimer’s went out of control couldn’t be more crystal clear, as is the reasoning that inspires an ape named Caesar to incite a revolt.

James Franco plays scientist Will Rodman, who’s experimenting with his Alzheimer’s treatment on apes. His most recent tests show incredible cognitive abilities in one ape and so he makes a presentation to the company’s board asking for permission to trial the drug on humans. Things go wrong during the presentation, however, when the ape goes, well — ape — and on display for the whole lab. The apes are ordered to be put down and Franco’s whole operation gets shut down.

However, the trial ape had been hiding a baby. Will secretly takes it home where his father (John Lithgow) suffers from Alzheimer’s. Turns out the chimp, which his father names Caesar, inherited the cognitive abilities of the drug through its mother. As Caesar grows and exhibits wonderful mental growth (including helping Will land an otherwise pointless girlfriend in Freida Pinto), Will desperately tests the drug on his father and unexpectedly he has hope for the project to continue.

This origin story plays out for most of the film, but Caesar ends up becoming the focus. Although he says nothing, he generates incredible sympathy through consummate mo-cap actor Andy Serkis (Gollum in “The Lord of the Rings”). Add to that the growing scientific moral dilemma and “Rise” builds quite the captivating story. The turning points for Caesar that result in and arise from his inhumane captivity all wield the collision that pivotal moments should carry in all movies. Despite a story that originated almost 45 years ago, the script lays this perfect and scientifically reasonable foundation for the “Planet of the Apes” we already know. The only thing that seems like a reach is the speed with which the apes develop certain tactical abilities once they all receive the drug.

Director Rupert Wyatt definitely understands the script handed to him as he gives us the appropriate magnitude to these effective plot points and knows how to create mouth-agape moments. When Oyewolo’s character arrives at the lab canteen to find a bunch of tables overturned Wyatt pans up to reveal he’s surrounded by apes. There’s no reason to think they weren’t there waiting for him, but we’re caught off guard just long a sufficient amount to know he better make a run for it. Those are the “glory shots” that make a true blockbuster.

Much of the action used to endorse the film comes in the film’s final act, which uses all the slowly building tension from scenes showing cruelty toward the apes in the second act to fuel the fire. With such strong incentive accumulated during these first two chunks of the film, the action doesn’t have to be that explosive or visceral in order to be effective. Apes tearing humans limb for limb would have certainly made for a more attractive film to say the least, but “Rise” manages to get away with the tamer action due to all the powerful setup and Wyatt provokes some imagination-inspired gore. In addition, the fact that the apes just knock people out cold serves the script’s efforts to show how — just like humans — some apes are violent and evil in nature while some are sympathetic and merciful. The film skilfully muddles our perception of who to root for in this sense.

Considering prequels intrinsically risk their quality on the fact that we know the end result, it’s impressive that “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” maintains our interest consistently throughout. The ending does leave something to be wanted because it ends just as the battle between apes and humans seems to be going somewhere, but even though I’m not sure what would happen (or what the name would be for that matter), if the sequel picks up right where this left off — count me in.


Additional resources:

Need an answer?
Get insightful answers from community-recommended
in TV & Movie Reviews on Knoji.
Would you recommend this author as an expert in TV & Movie Reviews?
You have 0 recommendations remaining to grant today.
Comments (1)

Good review. I haven't seen it yet and now I really want to. I loved James Franco in 127 hours (an emotionally traumatic film if you haven't seen it).